What you Should Know Before Filing a Covid-19 Personal Injury Claim

What you Should Know Before Filing a Covid-19 Personal Injury Claim
Image by Christo Anestev from Pixabay

With the global pandemic constantly changing the way we live our daily lives, we have all been faced, at some point, with a situation that asked us who is to blame for our potential contact with the virus. If this health risk was caused by a business or institution, you might be eligible for a Covid-19 personal injury claim.

If that is the case, you should be armed with the necessary knowledge to approach what is a complicated and intricate legal situation with as much clarity and professional help as you can muster.

What Has Changed with Covid-19 Injury Claims?

Since the global pandemic, a new branch of this legal subdivision has been birthed – through the questioning aspect of who or what is to blame for the social contact that an individual might have with the virus.

Whether potential contact is caused by a business or state institution failing to respect WHO-imposed measures of virus protection, you need to be aware of your rights. And injury lawyers are here to help.

When is a Business Responsible for my Exposure?

If you have become suspect of the Covid-19 virus following a visit to a business establishment with poor virology prevention measures, investigations need to be undertaken in order to establish the party that is to blame.

In this situation, the way that Las Vegas law works is that, if you were injured at a bar or nightclub, the business owner is at fault for a direct instance of civil tort law.

For instance, if a public restaurant or service has failed to respect the consistent disinfection of its kitchenware, hasn’t imposed the need for gloves or other protective equipment in the handling of foods, or if they haven’t applied seating arrangements that are in line with social distancing recommendations, these are all facts that could greatly contribute to a virus exposure negligence claim.

The FDA has clearly laid-out a set of guidelines and best practices for every retail food store, restaurant, or delivery service across the US. Consequently, neglecting or ignoring these instructions is putting all of us at risk, and action should be taken immediately if this results in one or multiple people being injured by this behavior.

When is the Government Responsible for my Exposure?

Tort claims can also occur in a government to citizen environment, and as such, if you intend on filing a tort claim against the state of Nevada, here is what you need to know.

With the original plan of reopening all schools around Clark County on the 24th of August, albeit with a blended teaching model, a number of questions still lingered regarding just how safe it would be to bring students and teaching staff into contact once again.

While the decision ended in an online-only approach for the beginning of the 2020/2021 school year, what happens in the future? Especially in the case of any new waves of infection. Is it truly safe for anyone to spend that much time in a crowded classroom, social distancing measures or not?

The answers are a bit more complicated. The government is doing what it thinks best for the common good of all citizens, and now that we are six months into the pandemic, the trial and error process has taught everyone how to best approach the intricate socio-economic changes that the pandemic has brought on.

However, just because the intent is noble, that doesn’t automatically equate to the proper execution of the implied safety policies. If you, as teacher or a parent, consider that the school is putting you or your child at risk of exposure because of negligent safety practices, you should consult a legal representative immediately.


With the right legal counsel, you will be able to receive the emotional and financial compensation you are entitled to for your suffering. Regardless if said compensation comes from a private business or a governmental institution.

A personal injury claim of Covid-19 exposure is not something that should be dismissed by pure factor of difficulty to prove in a legal setting.